10/27: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky explains why the Supreme Court was right to rule that political redistricting is constitutional.
10/9: The Supreme Court will take on a case that will decide whether encouraging illegal immigration to the US is in fact protected speech.
10/7: The Supreme Court rejected an official's request not to hear a Second Amendment case in New York.
8/16: ACRU Policy Board Member Hans von Spakovsky and Thomas Jipping report on five Democratic senators threatening the Supreme Court with political retaliation if it doesn't rule against Second Amendment rights.
8/13: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski reports on the Democratic politicians and presidential candidates threatening the Supreme Court with court packing if they do not offer liberal rulings on the Second Amendment.
8/7: The ACRU joined the fight for Freedom of Religion by filing an amicus brief supporting the Bladensburg Cross.
The American Civil Rights Union Urges the Supreme Court to Protect Free Speech by Overturning Hill v. Colorado
7/11: The American Civil Rights Union has filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Price v. Chicago, encouraging the Court to agree to take the case.
7/10: The victory is significant because it takes the federal courts out of the political gerrymandering thicket.
6/28: ACRU General Counsel Ken Klukowski reports on the Supreme Court's announcement that they would rule on the DACA case before the 2020 election.
6/28: Supreme Court precedent is clear that “a jurisdiction may engage in constitutional political gerrymandering” and that “political considerations are inseparable from districting and apportionment.”